Inspiration and Innerancy origins?

A place to snark and vent about CoC doctrine and/or our experiences in the CoC. This is a place for SUPPORT and AGREEMENT only, not a place to tell someone their experience and feelings are wrong, or why we disagree with them.
Post Reply
longdistancerunner
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2022 11:56 pm

Inspiration and Innerancy origins?

Post by longdistancerunner »

Where do the concepts of inspiration of the Bible and inerrancy of the Bible come from. And do they apply to both OT and NT?
zeek
Posts: 1116
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:46 pm

Re: Inspiration and Innerancy origins?

Post by zeek »

longdistancerunner wrote: Tue Sep 17, 2024 12:24 pm Where do the concepts of inspiration of the Bible and inerrancy of the Bible come from. And do they apply to both OT and NT?
II Timothy 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:" KJV
"All things are difficult before they are easy."(found in a fortune cookie)
"We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the oppressed. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Forgetting isn't healing." Elie Wiesel
B.H.
Posts: 4540
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:26 pm

Re: Inspiration and Innerancy origins?

Post by B.H. »

Revelation warns against adding or taking away from that book. There is an epistle that warns about adding to the word too I believe. Jeremiah 8 laments about the lying pen of the scribes turning the law into a lie.

History shows there is great variance between biblical manuscripts. My favorite example is Esther. Our copy of Esther is only about half the length in content we find other ancient copies of Esther that goes into detail what God was doing behind the scenes.

Jeremiah and Ezekiel can vary up to about an eight in content and verses all copies seem to have are often worded different or changed completely.

The thing is you have no way of knowing what was supposed to be there or what is supposedly true or not. Believing scholars can't prove what is legitimate because they themselves disagree over variant texts. The unbelieving ones are more honest and admit you can't really know.
The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.----Karl Marx
Post Reply