Page 2 of 4

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:38 pm
by onward
faithfyl wrote:I don't want to drink out of the same cup as everyone else, or pinch off the same loaf of bread, because I do not want someone else's germs. It is more sanitary to have individual cups and pieces of cracker.
In a one-cup/loaf church (gross to the max) I would immediately move from my comfortable backseat pew to the front pew ... being first in line is a no-brainer.

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:07 pm
by Lev
faithfyl wrote:Our church has gluten free crackers now for communion. Is that scriptural? I bet that could be another 140 page book.
I've heard of COCs refusing to offer gluten-free bread. God will protect those with Celiac disease, provided they have enough faith of course. Same mentality as snake-handling?

Lev

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:48 am
by Moogy
Lev wrote:
faithfyl wrote:Our church has gluten free crackers now for communion. Is that scriptural? I bet that could be another 140 page book.
I've heard of COCs refusing to offer gluten-free bread. God will protect those with Celiac disease, provided they have enough faith of course. Same mentality as snake-handling?

Lev
Why not just serve gluten-free to everyone? Nah, that would make too much sense!

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:19 am
by Lev
Moogy wrote:Why not just serve gluten-free to everyone? Nah, that would make too much sense!
Something about it not being 'real' bread. Well, then what about alcohol-free wine? Consistency is not one of the COC's strong points.

Lev

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:35 pm
by B.H.
onward wrote:
faithfyl wrote:I don't want to drink out of the same cup as everyone else, or pinch off the same loaf of bread, because I do not want someone else's germs. It is more sanitary to have individual cups and pieces of cracker.
In a one-cup/loaf church (gross to the max) I would immediately move from my comfortable backseat pew to the front pew ... being first in line is a no-brainer.

You'd be able to hear the sermon better then.

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:44 pm
by onward
B.H. wrote:
onward wrote:
faithfyl wrote:I don't want to drink out of the same cup as everyone else, or pinch off the same loaf of bread, because I do not want someone else's germs. It is more sanitary to have individual cups and pieces of cracker.
In a one-cup/loaf church (gross to the max) I would immediately move from my comfortable backseat pew to the front pew ... being first in line is a no-brainer.

You'd be able to hear the sermon better then.
Very true! In my backseat pew (reprobate section) I could wear my earbuds without the pulpiteer noticing.

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 8:47 am
by red letter man
If...somehow...we were able to duplicate the last supper down to the exact minute detail...using the same cup, ( or cups) the same bread , on the original table in the original room wearing the original clothes, etcetera ...but did not have love in our hearts ....what good is it at all?

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:26 pm
by onward
red letter man wrote:If...somehow...we were able to duplicate the last supper down to the exact minute detail...using the same cup, ( or cups) the same bread , on the original table in the original room wearing the original clothes, etcetera ...but did not have love in our hearts ....what good is it at all?
Some church groups feel absolutely compelled to literally recreate the exact practices the first century church followed, and anything - less or more - than walking in exactly the same steps, automatically puts one on a fast track to Hell.

Churches today (blinded by their church traditions) practice a communion observance that is completely out-of-whack with the early church method. We don't have to walk lockstep with the early church in every aspect to be acceptable to the Creator, IMHO.

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:22 pm
by williamray123
onward wrote:
red letter man wrote:If...somehow...we were able to duplicate the last supper down to the exact minute detail...using the same cup, ( or cups) the same bread , on the original table in the original room wearing the original clothes, etcetera ...but did not have love in our hearts ....what good is it at all?
Some church groups feel absolutely compelled to literally recreate the exact practices the first century church followed, and anything - less or more - than walking in exactly the same steps, automatically puts one on a fast track to Hell.

Churches today (blinded by their church traditions) practice a communion observance that is completely out-of-whack with the early church method. We don't have to walk lockstep with the early church in every aspect to be acceptable to the Creator, IMHO.
Well if we really re-created the last supper, it would be a Jewish passover and on a thursday night, correct?

Re: example of Church of Christ silliness

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 8:47 pm
by agricola
williamray123 wrote:
onward wrote:
red letter man wrote:If...somehow...we were able to duplicate the last supper down to the exact minute detail...using the same cup, ( or cups) the same bread , on the original table in the original room wearing the original clothes, etcetera ...but did not have love in our hearts ....what good is it at all?
Some church groups feel absolutely compelled to literally recreate the exact practices the first century church followed, and anything - less or more - than walking in exactly the same steps, automatically puts one on a fast track to Hell.

Churches today (blinded by their church traditions) practice a communion observance that is completely out-of-whack with the early church method. We don't have to walk lockstep with the early church in every aspect to be acceptable to the Creator, IMHO.
Well if we really re-created the last supper, it would be a Jewish passover and on a thursday night, correct?
Not necessarily. The gospels aren't congruent on that point.