Thinking of other groups and Mosaic Law
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2016 2:07 pm
The Mosaic Law seemed to me like the iron fist in the velvet glove. It had good and comforting things about it, but it was never ever ending in all the details.
I think this writer gets close to the concern I used to have for those who were holding on to old systems.
h**p://www.thevillagechurch.net/sermon/ ... osaic-law/
I see the Amish and Mennonite and Dunkards and others as having to carry a heavy burden with their religion which is now so much of a tradition they are locked into. Yes, I know some claim to be happy and are willing to take on the burden, but I just always thought about how the training wheels are supposed to come off some day. And so the same way with those that choose to follow some portion or version of the Mosaic Law. It has good things, but Christianity has those things too. It always seemed to me that people could still get the things they wanted like a connection to God, strong faithful families, work ethic, etc...the good culture things that people are wanting with out the additional burdensome aspects. I mean can't one get the good things in life and not have to endure the cultural baggage and abuse that comes from being members of these groups? Does dealing with the cultural baggage and downside provide the "good aspects" or are they always wanting those aspects to be lessened? So I always felt the need to demonstrate that the positive aspects people are wanting can be found in other systems which do not have the down side.
It wasn't like I felt sorry for them since I know for the most part people choose what they want and kids that are raised to think that way are not really aware of how much burden they are enduring...they just know it as normal. Much like kids in the CofC...it is just normal. I just do not see the actual value in staying or justifying the burden and downside in order to get the good stuff of a system. And that used to really bother me a lot and I wondered what could be done about it or what people would say once their life is over and looking back on it all. I wonder what I will say when I look back on it all.
I think this writer gets close to the concern I used to have for those who were holding on to old systems.
h**p://www.thevillagechurch.net/sermon/ ... osaic-law/
I see the Amish and Mennonite and Dunkards and others as having to carry a heavy burden with their religion which is now so much of a tradition they are locked into. Yes, I know some claim to be happy and are willing to take on the burden, but I just always thought about how the training wheels are supposed to come off some day. And so the same way with those that choose to follow some portion or version of the Mosaic Law. It has good things, but Christianity has those things too. It always seemed to me that people could still get the things they wanted like a connection to God, strong faithful families, work ethic, etc...the good culture things that people are wanting with out the additional burdensome aspects. I mean can't one get the good things in life and not have to endure the cultural baggage and abuse that comes from being members of these groups? Does dealing with the cultural baggage and downside provide the "good aspects" or are they always wanting those aspects to be lessened? So I always felt the need to demonstrate that the positive aspects people are wanting can be found in other systems which do not have the down side.
It wasn't like I felt sorry for them since I know for the most part people choose what they want and kids that are raised to think that way are not really aware of how much burden they are enduring...they just know it as normal. Much like kids in the CofC...it is just normal. I just do not see the actual value in staying or justifying the burden and downside in order to get the good stuff of a system. And that used to really bother me a lot and I wondered what could be done about it or what people would say once their life is over and looking back on it all. I wonder what I will say when I look back on it all.