A question for Teresa....

Fun or serious topics, including politics, current events and questions about the site. This is a place for SUPPORT and AGREEMENT only. That means doing our best to recognize and support the needs and feelings of others. To engage in respectful discussion with others who have a differing viewpoint, use "Coffee House".
User avatar
Ivy
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:05 pm

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by Ivy »

B.H. wrote:There are some academics who theorize mnala never really existed but was a figment of people needing some sort of liberation hope. :lol:
That was Karl Marx. :lol: :lol: :lol:
~Stone Cold Ivyrose Austin~
User avatar
teresa
Site Admin
Posts: 1396
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 10:57 am

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by teresa »

Keep in mind that mnala had a miraculous recovery.
User avatar
Ivy
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:05 pm

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by Ivy »

teresa wrote:Keep in mind that mnala had a miraculous recovery.
Yes he surely did!!! He was at death's door but was miraculously raised up. Quite a few of us heard that story around the campfire.
~Stone Cold Ivyrose Austin~
Lerk
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 3:27 pm

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by Lerk »

I was on the old board. I think there were two parts to it... one for actual "ex" folks and one for people who were still in. At the time, I was hoping to change the church from within (yeah, right!). One thing that had happened was a conversation with a guy at work where, out of the blue, he asked me if I thought one was saved at the point of faith or at the point of baptism. I explained the usual CoC view, and he replied that he could see that point, but he could also see the other side of it. Then he blew my mind by saying something that should have been obvious: "Fortunately for me, the point is moot. I was baptized, so it doesn't matter whether God saved me at that point or before. I've done what I was commanded to do."

Woah! That whole "can't be taught wrong and baptized right" thing was BS! And of course there was a lot of other stuff taught in the NI-CoC that I thought wasn't right, and I thought I could change things, so it was recommended that I join the "still in" board.

Now I'm an atheist. (Somewhat closeted and still officially a member-in-weak-standing at a NI-CoC (warming a seat sometimes but never participating)... so crazy!)

Am I confused about the 2-parts-to-the-board thing? It was a long time ago and I don't necessarily trust my memory.
User avatar
teresa
Site Admin
Posts: 1396
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 10:57 am

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by teresa »

There is this Support Board, and there is also a Discussion Board that has a separate registration. The Discussion board is intended to be a place where the ex-CoC and CoC can meet. However, few people post there anymore.
User avatar
Ivy
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:05 pm

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by Ivy »

At the time, I was hoping to change the church from within (yeah, right!).
Yep. A lot of us have tried that...it's like screaming into the wind. :lol:
~Stone Cold Ivyrose Austin~
tarheel
Posts: 784
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:29 am

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by tarheel »

Lerk wrote:I was on the old board. I think there were two parts to it... one for actual "ex" folks and one for people who were still in. At the time, I was hoping to change the church from within (yeah, right!). One thing that had happened was a conversation with a guy at work where, out of the blue, he asked me if I thought one was saved at the point of faith or at the point of baptism. I explained the usual CoC view, and he replied that he could see that point, but he could also see the other side of it. Then he blew my mind by saying something that should have been obvious: "Fortunately for me, the point is moot. I was baptized, so it doesn't matter whether God saved me at that point or before. I've done what I was commanded to do."

Woah! That whole "can't be taught wrong and baptized right" thing was BS! And of course there was a lot of other stuff taught in the NI-CoC that I thought wasn't right, and I thought I could change things, so it was recommended that I join the "still in" board.

Now I'm an atheist. (Somewhat closeted and still officially a member-in-weak-standing at a NI-CoC (warming a seat sometimes but never participating)... so crazy!)

Am I confused about the 2-parts-to-the-board thing? It was a long time ago and I don't necessarily trust my memory.
A question - If you are an athiest, don't you find going through the motions at church a bit awkward? I am a non-believer, mostly leaning to the athiest side as opposed to agnostic. My wife is Methodist and on the few times I have attended with her I can hardly sit still and listen to them teach and preach something that I fervently believe is not true.
Chachi
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:10 pm

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by Chachi »

I have found the guy who writes under the name Theodore Dalrymple to be helpful. He is an atheist but is not an "anti-theist". He says that religion has done a lot of good and it is our civilization. So while I don't buy a lot of the things said in organized religion I do recognize the value in conserving what is good and best and helpful.
User avatar
Ivy
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:05 pm

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by Ivy »

Chachi wrote: So while I don't buy a lot of the things said in organized religion I do recognize the value in conserving what is good and best and helpful.
Same here. I don't have a need to try to change other people's views; spirituality is a very personal thing.
~Stone Cold Ivyrose Austin~
B.H.
Posts: 4572
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:26 pm

Re: A question for Teresa....

Post by B.H. »

Ivy wrote:
teresa wrote:Keep in mind that mnala had a miraculous recovery.
Yes he surely did!!! He was at death's door but was miraculously raised up. Quite a few of us heard that story around the campfire.
It was a very bad case of [deleted by teresa]
The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.----Karl Marx
Post Reply