A place to snark and vent about CoC doctrine and/or our experiences in the CoC. This is a place for SUPPORT and AGREEMENT only, not a place to tell someone their experience and feelings are wrong, or why we disagree with them.
B.H.
Posts: 4572 Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:26 pm
Post
by B.H. » Fri Sep 11, 2015 8:32 pm
klp wrote: NO, because the approved example is to "lay" with your wife?
But using command ,example, and necessary inference must the woman be on top or bottom?
The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.----Karl Marx
bnot
Posts: 229 Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 3:22 am
Location: Southern California
Post
by bnot » Sat Sep 12, 2015 2:36 am
B.H. wrote: klp wrote: NO, because the approved example is to "lay" with your wife?
But using command ,example, and necessary inference must the woman be on top or bottom?
Ivy
Posts: 6473 Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:05 pm
Post
by Ivy » Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:07 am
B.H. wrote: klp wrote: NO, because the approved example is to "lay" with your wife?
But using command ,example, and necessary inference must the woman be on top or bottom?
All things are permissable, BH.
~Stone Cold Ivyrose Austin~
B.H.
Posts: 4572 Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:26 pm
Post
by B.H. » Sat Sep 12, 2015 11:47 am
Ivy wrote: B.H. wrote: klp wrote: NO, because the approved example is to "lay" with your wife?
But using command ,example, and necessary inference must the woman be on top or bottom?
All things are permissable, BH.
But not all things are expedient.
The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.----Karl Marx
Ivy
Posts: 6473 Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:05 pm
Post
by Ivy » Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:26 pm
B.H. wrote: Ivy wrote: B.H. wrote:
But using command ,example, and necessary inference must the woman be on top or bottom?
All things are permissable, BH.
But not all things are expedient.
We'll just leave it right there.
~Stone Cold Ivyrose Austin~
Lev
Posts: 418 Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:58 pm
Post
by Lev » Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:08 pm
Dodger wrote: So if the neighbors see them they don't think that they are dancing!
Got it
B.H.
Posts: 4572 Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:26 pm
Post
by B.H. » Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:59 pm
We'll just leave it right there.
It feels really, really, really good with it there doesn't it.
No, BH. Just - No. Agricola
The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.----Karl Marx
B.H.
Posts: 4572 Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:26 pm
Post
by B.H. » Sun Sep 13, 2015 8:49 pm
The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.----Karl Marx
agricola
Posts: 4835 Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 10:31 pm
Post
by agricola » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:54 am
BH - no real names!
For the record, for those who missed it (and I hope you did), BH posted a series of statements which I considered outside the permissible usage on this board, and I deleted part of a previous post.
History is the fiction we invent to persuade ourselves that events are knowable and that life has order and direction. That's why events are always reinterpreted when values change. We need new versions of history to allow for our current prejudices.
Ivy
Posts: 6473 Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:05 pm
Post
by Ivy » Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:34 am
~Stone Cold Ivyrose Austin~