Until
recently, the fastest growing wing of the Movement was the
International Church of Christ,
headquartered in Los Angeles.
Previously known
as the Boston
Church of Christ, it was begun in the late 1970s by Kip McKean. McKean
was trained by the
Crossroads Church of
Christ movement centered in Gainesville, Florida, then headed by Chuck
Lucas (who is no longer associated with the movement). Chuck Lucas was trained
by Campus Evangelism, a short-lived movement within the mainstream Churches of
Christ that took its cues from Bill
Bright's Campus Crusade for Christ.
The movement centered around
college campuses, and emphasized total commitment to the degree that it was viewed by
watchdog groups as a cult.
They routinely asked members to live communally together, attend church
functions every evening, and invite a quota every week to introductory Bible
Talks. The Crossroads Movement and the ICC were intensely hierarchical, with each
member assigned to a prayer partner or discipler for accountability and obedience. There were
clearly defined steps up the ladder to each leadership position. Other
than their hierarchy, methods of evangelism and discipling, their theology
differed little from mainstream hard-line Churches of Christ.
College students,
alone and away from home for the first time, poured into the movement by the
thousands. They could declare independence from their parents, find love and
friendship from their fellow Christians, and love from God like they had never
experienced before. The confession of sins made their hearts feel pure and the
acapella singing made their hearts soar with worship.
Critics described
the ICC as operating in double-bind catch-22s. "Let's all
kneel to pray...now all of you who didn't want to kneel while we prayed,
repent!" Critics also pointed out the custom, common in many groups, of one
speaker pausing to whisper a private joke into the ear of the next speaker as he approached
the microphone, a subtle way of letting everyone in the audience know they are
not in the private leadership clique. The reason those in the audience put up
with it is because they are projecting themselves onto the leaders, hoping they
will one day climb the ladder and be able to share private jokes on the podium
themselves.
Critics also
described that each interaction with the ICC was always a challenge to the ICC
person's honor. People often came away feeling confused, depressed and shamed
after interacting with the ICC.
Many accused the
ICC of having a revolving door, with members burning out after two or three years. Members who left the ICC often refused to go
anywhere to church, and some, even after going to another church, insisted they
weren't producing fruit and therefore were not saved.
The first question
an ICC leader would ask a Church of Christ preacher in the 1980s would be "how
many members do you have in your congregation?" Numbers was always the most
important issue for ICC leaders, but this was always verbally denied. Goals and
quotas were set up, cloaked in spiritual terms and the carnality denied
repeatedly. The Boston Church of Christ even had a policy on how to rehabilitate
leaders who had suffered nervous breakdowns in the high pressure competitive
environment.
The ICC alienated other Churches of Christ by demanding
in the 1980s rebaptism of members who
came out of traditional Churches of Christ, because their previous baptisms were
not in the context of a discipling baptism, therefore not valid. There were
occasional statements from ICC speakers that members in the mainstream Churches
of Christ were not saved.
Kip
McKean, after being trained at Crossroads, was hired by a Church of Christ in
Champagne, Illinois, as a campus minister. He was fired soon afterwards for
disobeying elders while pursuing his vision for the church. This fact is hidden from members
of the ICC, and astounds them when they find out, because the biggest sin in the
ICC, as taught by McKean, was disobeying the elders.
From Illinois he
went to Lexington, Massachusetts to a 50 member congregation who hired him after
he received a promise from each member that they would give "total commitment"
to Christ. Within a few short years the Boston Church of Christ had over a
thousand members, and was sending out teams to start churches all over the USA,
and shortly all over the world. In the 1990s the base of operations moved to Los Angeles and
the group was renamed the International
Church of Christ headed by Kip McKean and seven leaders. It was at this time
that the ICC incorporated instrumental music into the worship, further
distancing themselves from the mainstream a capella Churches of Christ, who
reject both instruments of music and denominational oversight.
The ICC went through
a split in 2001 when Kip McKean's daughter, a student at Harvard, left the ICC.
Many saw this as an understandable response to the "total commitment" pressure cooker environment
of the ICC. Her leaving would not have been a problem except for the fact that Kip McKean had made
a rule that no-one could be an elder in the ICC unless their house was in order,
including all their adult children faithfully serving in the ICC. This is a
common interpretation of the qualifications of elders as set forth by the
apostle Paul (see sidebar) in many hard-line Churches of Christ.
This is further
complicated by the fact that obedience to church leaders was one of the most
important commandments in the ICC up until 2001, and one which they still
struggle to define today. Kip McKean was asked to step down.
The
Portland International Church of Christ
is now headed by Kip McKean who is seeking a
comeback among the
"sold-out disciples". The ICC has repudiated McKean and is beginning
to seek
acceptance by mainstream evangelical denominations (while searching for its
identity).
The Response from the hard-line Churches of
Christ
There are many
shaving mirrors that have one side magnified. There were very few in the
Churches of Christ that saw the ICC as an accurate magnified mirror reflection
of themselves: the challenge to one's honor, the emphasis on evangelism and
numbers, the exclusive claim to be the one true church based on their own
ability to reproduce the early church. All of these ingredients have been the
core of the hard-line Churches of Christ for decades.
The Churches of
Christ's response however was more like the Jews hating the Samaritans in the
time of Christ. Reams of photocopies of vituperative articles in heavy manila
envelopes were mailed to every Church of Christ for years, to try to stem the
tide of the new arrogant teenager on the block.